Post-Publication Discussion URL

Our Commitment

Science advances through open discussion

PrimA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kesehatan recognizes that scholarly communication may continue after an article has been published. Constructive comments, critical observations, questions, and requests for clarification can contribute to the interpretation of research findings and the development of scientific knowledge.

The journal welcomes relevant, evidence-based, and respectful feedback concerning published articles. All post-publication communications should be grounded in scientific reasoning and handled fairly, transparently, and in accordance with the journal's editorial policies.

Ways to Contribute

Types of Post-Publication Feedback

Substantive feedback can help clarify findings and strengthen the scholarly record.

 
✎

Scientific Comments

Evidence-based observations, methodological critiques, or alternative interpretations relating to a published article.

 
?

Questions & Clarifications

Requests for clarification about research methods, data interpretation, findings, or statements in a published article.

 
✓

Corrections

Reports of potential factual, data, or other errors that may require correction to maintain the accuracy of the published record.

 
⚖

Research Integrity Concerns

Evidence-based concerns about possible ethical or scientific problems that may affect the reliability of a published article.

Guidance for Readers

How to Submit a Comment

Readers who wish to comment on a published article should identify the article clearly, preferably by providing its title, author names, publication year, DOI, or article URL. The submission should explain the issue being raised and provide supporting evidence or relevant references where appropriate.

  • Keep the discussion focused on the scientific content of the article.
  • Provide clear reasoning and supporting evidence for factual or methodological claims.
  • Use respectful, professional, and constructive language.
  • Disclose relevant conflicts of interest.
  • Avoid personal attacks, unsupported allegations, and confidential information.
Editorial Review

How the Journal Handles Feedback

01

Initial Assessment

The editorial team assesses whether the comment is relevant, sufficiently substantiated, and appropriate for further consideration.

02

Consultation and Response

Where appropriate, the journal may consult independent experts or invite the original authors to respond to substantive scientific comments.

03

Editorial Decision

Depending on the nature of the issue and the journal's available publication formats, the editor may consider publishing a comment and response, issuing a correction, or taking another appropriate action.

04

Maintaining the Scholarly Record

If a significant error or research integrity concern is substantiated, the journal will consider proportionate measures consistent with its publication ethics policies.

Respectful Dialogue

Post-publication discussion should encourage rigorous debate while respecting the dignity, professional reputation, and rights of all participants.

Editorial Independence

Editorial decisions concerning comments, responses, and corrections should be based on relevance, evidence, fairness, and the integrity of the scholarly record.